Re:Simple Dockerfile examples are often broken by default
by verroq on Tuesday May 28, 2019 @02:29PM
(#20032912)
No not really, any tiny open source project isn’t worth the hassle of making a reproducible build for.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Simple Dockerfile examples are often broken by default
by OJFord on Tuesday May 28, 2019 @02:35PM
(#20032980)
Well, I look at reproducible as a scale (and incidentally, with an increase in effort as you slide along it, too).
A certain amount of reproducibility - a container, pinned dependencies - gives such large reward for how easy it is to achieve that it absolutely is worth it for a tiny open source project.
Worrying about the possibility of unavailable package registries and revoked signing keys, on the other hand, probably isn't.
It's a trade-off. But you certainly don't need to be Google-scale for some of it to be very worth your while.