News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Steep decline in nuclear power would threaten energy secu... by pjc50 on Tuesday May 28, 2019 @11:32AM (#20031138)
> We have more money than time (and costs of nuclear, if scaled out, are exaggerated).

Getting the money from the taxpayer or energy consumer is the number one obstacle to all of these things. The costs of nuclear if anything seem to be underestimated: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/dec/21/hinkley-point-c...

Re:Steep decline in nuclear power would threaten energy secu... by Robotbeat on Tuesday May 28, 2019 @12:09PM (#20031495)
The cost of nuclear is maximized when we're speaking of one site. That's why I mentioned scale out of nuclear. You're not going to get a beneficial learning curve unless you're building and siting lots of power plants with the same contractor(s).

Even with inflated costs, however, the extremely high latitude of the UK and its need for wintertime heat mean that the amount of renewable curtailment needed to ensure sufficient carbonfree wintertime energy make nuclear still cost competitive in a carbonfree scenario.

Generally speaking, no halfway competent investment in carbonfree energy should be opposed, IMHO. We don't have time to fight such internal battles when we're fighting anthropogenic climate change.