News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:100% renewables doesn’t equal zero-carbon energy, and the... by epistasis on Saturday May 25, 2019 @11:58PM (#20013024)
Your link is about residential prices, not about the cost to build the reactors.

There are two key questions: 1) what was the subsidy level for construction of the French generation of reactors, and 2) can we do this again?

That second question is of course the most important one, and the answer seems to be a resounding and hard no, at least if the French are constructing it, based on their recent attempts.

South Korea is also cited as another country that may have figured out how to build reactors cheaply. However recent news is that it was all cartels and corruption and there's likely massive amounts of fraud.

That leaves what, Canada and Russia? Canada I kind of trust, and Russia not at all. CANDUs were pretty great, but we can't exactly order more of them now.

It seems that the age of the Rankine cycle's efficiency is coming to an end, at least in terms of cost effectiveness. Even natural gas uses a combined cycle to compete these days, as new tech finally usurps what has been the champion for over a century.

Re:100% renewables doesn’t equal zero-carbon energy, and the... by pfdietz on Tuesday June 04, 2019 @08:01AM (#20094119)
Canada gave up on CANDU. The ACR got no buyers, and the remnants of AECL were sold for a mere $15M.