News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why I Switched to Duck Duck Go Permanently by secret on Monday December 13, 2010 @12:13PM (#2001124)
To add on to this, every search engine is generally pretty bad at math related searches. It may be something worth looking into.
Re:Why I Switched to Duck Duck Go Permanently by epi0Bauqu on Monday December 13, 2010 @12:18PM (#2001141)
Can you give some examples as to math searches, the more the better :)
Re:Why I Switched to Duck Duck Go Permanently by thebooktocome on Monday December 13, 2010 @12:43PM (#2001274)
There are two major problems I've found.

1. Poor interpretation: "distribution of compact support" brings up nothing very useful in DDG -- a bunch of linkfarms, it looks like -- but in Google the third result for me is a relevant .pdf from Oregon State.

2. Users attempting to ad-hoc convert math notation into ascii: Google understands "l 2 space", but DDG thinks I mean "l2space" which is some sort of gallery in I don't know where.

It's a hard, nontrivial problem.

Re:Why I Switched to Duck Duck Go Permanently by jacquesm on Monday December 13, 2010 @01:29PM (#2001445)
I think this actually homes in on one of the bigger issues with setting up a competing search engine, you have to be equal to or better than the incumbent all the time, and that is really hard.
Re:Why I Switched to Duck Duck Go Permanently by jessriedel on Monday December 13, 2010 @02:17PM (#2001620)
The use of familiar everyday terms for technical mathematical objects makes this difficult ("net", "space", "compact", etc.). Since most pages are either all about math or have nothing to do with math, I wonder if there's an easy way to tag the former pages, which would then be used as an advanced filter available when searching. ("Is this a math search?")