News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The rise of few-maintainer projects by skybrian on Saturday May 25, 2019 @11:45AM (#20009624)
I'm reminded of Wikipedia and drive-by edits. When each repo is so small (equivalent to a single article on Wikipedia, or even less), it seems like they should be part of larger organizations with a bit more bureaucracy and guidance?
Re:The rise of few-maintainer projects by yhoiseth on Saturday May 25, 2019 @01:39PM (#20010230)
Re:The rise of few-maintainer projects by anewhnaccount2 on Saturday May 25, 2019 @01:48PM (#20010278)
Re:The rise of few-maintainer projects by josteink on Sunday May 26, 2019 @02:23AM (#20013447)
> When each repo is so small (equivalent to a single article on Wikipedia, or even less), it seems like they should be part of larger organizations with a bit more bureaucracy and guidance?

You mean like publishing a coherent library-package, rather than a million independent function-packages?

We know how to do this, but the Node-community just won’t have it.

Re:The rise of few-maintainer projects by tosh on Saturday May 25, 2019 @12:40PM (#20009948)
Great idea.

Would make sense to pool volunteers for code reviews similar to what Stackoverflow does for questions, answers, edits etc.

Re:The rise of few-maintainer projects by nine_k on Saturday May 25, 2019 @10:34PM (#20012773)
Hmm, review and certification of open-source packages could likely be a business. Something similar to commercial Linux distributions, like RHEL, that test and vet their packages, but not limited to that.
Re:The rise of few-maintainer projects by firethief on Saturday May 25, 2019 @01:12PM (#20010098)
Like GitHub's organizations?