News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Author Slams eBook Piracy, Son Outs Her As a Music Pirate by WillyF on Monday December 13, 2010 @11:21AM (#2000922)
I never thought of it, but poaching is a lot like piracy. I don't think your intent was to make that analogy, but there are a lot of similarities.
Re:Author Slams eBook Piracy, Son Outs Her As a Music Pirate by hvs on Monday December 13, 2010 @11:24AM (#2000932)
Except that wildlife is a limited resource that needs to be protected from poachers. It's only like piracy if you think there is an unlimited supply of wildlife that anyone should be able to take as they like.
Re:Author Slams eBook Piracy, Son Outs Her As a Music Pirate by WillyF on Monday December 13, 2010 @11:30AM (#2000951)
As an avid fly fisherman, I completely agree; however, it's often very difficult for people to conceptualize that wildlife is a limited resource. How does my taking a fish that is a half inch under the limit really hurt anyone? What about an extra fish? Or fishing after dark when it's illegal? The negative effects are often extremely far removed from the initial act. That doesn't make it ok, but it does explain why many people who would never steal from a store will break all kinds of Fish and Game laws.
Re:Author Slams eBook Piracy, Son Outs Her As a Music Pirate by wvenable on Monday December 13, 2010 @12:34PM (#2001224)
This is tragedy of the commons -- if one person does it, there is no real harm but if everyone does it then there will be no fish left for anyone. A lot of people can conceptualize this but many others rely on the fact that other people don't break the rules.

Music piracy is similar. Piracy works right now because there are enough people buying music and the margins are high enough that those legitimate buyers are supporting the pirates. Only at the point that creating music is unprofitable will piracy be affected (no more fish in the sea). I don't see that happening for a long time.

Re:Author Slams eBook Piracy, Son Outs Her As a Music Pirate by chc on Monday December 13, 2010 @01:26PM (#2001430)
Even erstwhile pirates often buy music. In fact, studies have shown that pirates are actually the music industry's biggest supporters: http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2009/04/study-pirates-buy-...

There are some devout pirates who simply will not buy, but I suspect they would not buy even if they had another option — these are the people who would tape songs off the radio and copy their friends' CDs. They're either people who just refuse to pay for things or too poor to pay for things. But you can't generalize this to "pirates."

Re:Author Slams eBook Piracy, Son Outs Her As a Music Pirate by gnosis on Monday December 13, 2010 @03:33PM (#2001869)
"Only at the point that creating music is unprofitable will piracy be affected (no more fish in the sea)."

Many (most) musicians/artists create music/art for the love of it. They make very little if any money doing it. Often, they even do it at a loss.

It has been this way since long, long before the internet and filesharing existed.

Re:Author Slams eBook Piracy, Son Outs Her As a Music Pirate by steveklabnik on Monday December 13, 2010 @02:32PM (#2001662)
The zillions of unsigned bands wailing on guitars in every bar from Thursday to Sunday suggest that there'd still be plenty of music, even if there was no way to sell recordings.
Re:Author Slams eBook Piracy, Son Outs Her As a Music Pirate by dantheman on Monday December 13, 2010 @12:37PM (#2001239)
True, but those breaking the fish and game laws may not be hurting anyone. They may disagree with the law. Especially because the fish and game laws only apply to public property. It'd be more analogous to going to a private reserve or piece of land and disregarding the owners regulations.
Re:Author Slams eBook Piracy, Son Outs Her As a Music Pirate by tallanvor on Monday December 13, 2010 @11:49AM (#2001023)
An ebook, mp3, or other digital object can be considered an unlimited resource, the creator of said object is a limited resource, and they do deserve protection.

That said, authors and artists like the lady in the article are hurting themselves when they choose not to make their works available to people in the format they want, especially when it is very easy to convert those works into different formats, or at least easy enough that people are willing to do it.

Re:Author Slams eBook Piracy, Son Outs Her As a Music Pirate by DanielStraight on Monday December 13, 2010 @12:21PM (#2001156)
This is really an excellent observation. Thank you for sharing.

One consequence, it seems, would be that a work would enter public domain as soon as the creator dies, since the only remaining resource (the digital work) is unlimited.

Re:Author Slams eBook Piracy, Son Outs Her As a Music Pirate by tallanvor on Monday December 13, 2010 @01:38PM (#2001480)
There definitely needs to be meaningful copyright reform. Having works of art enter the public domain upon the death of the creator seems pretty fair, although there should probably be an extension for cases where children under the age of 18 are involved. And, of course, there should be an absolute time limit on all copyrights in the cases where they're assigned to corporations.