macOS X GateKeeper Bypass

Re:macOS X GateKeeper Bypass by bitexploder on Saturday May 25, 2019 @08:27AM (#20008630)

Nit to pick. Prefer the term coordinated disclosure. Responsible disclosure puts things on an unnecessary moral dimension. It’s not irresponsible to disclose bugs ever, IMO. I have seen this debate a million times now, but I know it is new for someone.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:macOS X GateKeeper Bypass by tptacek on Saturday May 25, 2019 @12:04PM (#20009732)

Notice that Intel used the term "coordinated disclosure" for last week's new raft of microarchitecture bugs; "responsible disclosure" is on the way out for exactly the reason you stated.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:macOS X GateKeeper Bypass by bitexploder on Saturday May 25, 2019 @02:07PM (#20010355)

That is neat, I actually didn’t even notice and I read the thing. Seems like progress on this topic to me.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:macOS X GateKeeper Bypass by kibwen on Tuesday May 28, 2019 @02:21PM (#20032851)

Thanks for the tip, I didn't know there existed a better term for this. Indeed, I always felt that "responsible" was a loaded adjective in that context.

[ Parent | on HN ]