News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:JLua: Yet another Lua implementation in JavaScript by Uptrenda on Saturday May 25, 2019 @06:03AM (#20008084)
Why do people put time and effort into a project and then name it as if its a generic, disposable, piece of garbage? Very strange
Re:JLua: Yet another Lua implementation in JavaScript by MaxBarraclough on Saturday May 25, 2019 @06:21AM (#20008156)
I have a different objection: the 'J' prefix is standard for projects in Java, not JavaScript. 'JSLua' would have been better.

Turns out there's already a Lua-in-Java project that goes by LuaJ: https://github.com/luaj/luaj

Re:JLua: Yet another Lua implementation in JavaScript by saagarjha on Saturday May 25, 2019 @06:06AM (#20008102)
It's a tradition, apparently: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yet_another
Re:JLua: Yet another Lua implementation in JavaScript by Uptrenda on Saturday May 25, 2019 @06:13AM (#20008131)
Interesting, I didn't know Yahoo! was based on this. +1
Re:JLua: Yet another Lua implementation in JavaScript by imtringued on Saturday May 25, 2019 @06:30AM (#20008188)
The problem with the name is that it's almost identical to the Java implementation of Lua which is called LuaJ.
Re:JLua: Yet another Lua implementation in JavaScript by mconintet on Sunday May 26, 2019 @03:03AM (#20013550)
I have no idea, maybe those people are unaware of others will turn a blind eye to what are in the project but complain a lot about the project name. Weird.