Re:What if we tested laws before passing them?
by rntz on Monday December 13, 2010 @10:35AM
(#2000726)
You have your Prolog backwards.
means that foo(X) is true if bar(X) is true, not the other way around. So your code would indicate that anything that's not a law is unconstitutional, and anything unconstitutional prohibits free exercise of religion (for example).
[ Parent
| on HN ]