Re:The lingua franca of LaTeX
by zzo38computer on Saturday May 25, 2019 @12:21AM
(#20007063)
It is much simpler, and many kind of post-processing can be done on it better too, and also you can compile the fonts per printer (DVI doesn't actually care about the font glyphs at all, and does not require that it is even a font glyph as is normally considered) as needed. If you have a printer that implements it, you could even do such things as cutting holes in pages, printing raised or engraved text, invisible ink, etc, without causing problems with software that does not support these things.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
PDF too supports external font files, a multitude of font formats, and special ink layers (these are called “separations”).
PDF also supports PostScript fonts, which are already compiled for your printer.
Re:The lingua franca of LaTeX
by zzo38computer on Saturday May 25, 2019 @12:48AM
(#20007134)
I didn't know that, but OK, so it does (although PostScript fonts won't be so good if you want to use bitmap fonts and stuff like that instead (I use METAFONT to compile bitmap fonts for the printer, and than use my own software to rasterize the page, by copying the generated font glyphs into the positions specified by the DVI file)).
Still, DVI is simpler for many uses. I think PDF is too complicated.