News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lightening run-time code generation by jlg23 on Friday May 24, 2019 @06:40PM (#20005925)
> I wonder why Andy didn't chose to write the JIT in Guile itself, with a binding to Lightening, rather than in C. Guile is designed to be embedded and have bindings written for it.

OP states "eventually I should be migrating this code over to Scheme anyway. And, of course, simple can mean fast, and I needed fast code generation.". That does not anwer you actual question (and neither does the article), but I gather this was to make the project finite (solve one and only one problem only at a time), not because the author was not aware.

Re:Lightening run-time code generation by chrisseaton on Friday May 24, 2019 @06:52PM (#20005990)
Yes that’s the statement I’m responding to “I didn't want to add more complexity to the C side of Guile“ but this is more C code. Maybe speed of generation was more important than anything else then.