Not to mention a presidential campaign where she peaked at 15% at the polls. While a low number for sure, it's still a significant figure when there were so many candidates at the time.

Fiorina also ran for president and she used her experience at HP as a talking point for how she was a good candidate. It boggles the mind.

And none of them have been been CEO of anything significant since their screw-ups. Sure sounds like failure to me.

Having over 10 million dollars seems to exclude eligibility for failure to me.

Since the topic is "CEOs who run a business into the ground easily find work leading other companies.", what is your point? Bringing up their wealth contributes nothing of relevance to this discussion.