News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ship spies largest underwater eruption ever by s_dev on Friday May 24, 2019 @02:01PM (#20003885)
The onus is on the person making the claim to bring evidence to the discussion.

"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissd without evidence" -- C. Hitchens

Since the comment was removed or deleted it originally said something like "Underwater volcanoes are the cause of Climate Change -- prove me wrong"

Re:Ship spies largest underwater eruption ever by koube on Friday May 24, 2019 @05:06PM (#20005287)
Since the question has been asked, I found this to be relatively convincing to the casual observer:

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-whats-warming-the-wo...

Re:Ship spies largest underwater eruption ever by GalacticDomin8r on Friday May 24, 2019 @03:46PM (#20004718)
Perhaps the only thing more absurd that original is censoring it and removing it.
Re:Ship spies largest underwater eruption ever by AnimalMuppet on Friday May 24, 2019 @04:36PM (#20005051)
It's not removed. Turn "showdead" on in your profile.
Re:Ship spies largest underwater eruption ever by Spare_account on Friday May 24, 2019 @05:38PM (#20005511)
Low quality comments are removed when flagged by enough people. It's actually a good thing.
[dead]
Re:Ship spies largest underwater eruption ever by toss1 on Friday May 24, 2019 @06:14PM (#20005760)
I find that the Venn diagram of

<dissent>

vs <evidence-free assertions, disruption, distraction, and disingenuous arguments>

do not overlap, and it is useful to distinguish between the two and to treat them differently.

To paraphrase Asimov, one person's ignorance (deliberate or not) is not equal to another's knowledge.