You can describe any software that way.
Big new headline features are a marketers wet dream.
"We fixed that annoying bug that affected 4 people last year" not so much.
Also, "driving for uber" is hardly a great thing to aspire to.
Re:GitHub Sponsors
by naniwaduni on Thursday May 23, 2019 @11:02AM
(#19992386)
I'd expect it to get worse. People pay for features over maintenance even more strongly than they allocate prestige.
Nah, there's a bug out there right now blocking my work I'd throw money at if I could. I can't be the only one who feels like this.
Re:GitHub Sponsors
by james-skemp on Thursday May 23, 2019 @02:49PM
(#19994666)
Rich, the creator of the Phaser framework, does something like this (I haven't dug into it much): https://github.com/photonstorm/phaser/issues/3390
It appears they leverage Bountysource (not familiar with it).
In my line of work there are perverse incentives for hyping up new stuff and then not dealing with bugs and problems. It's not been me doing that but I've suffered by comparison against others who embraced that dark pattern.
Complaints are publicity. They bump internet discussions, create buzz, and often go along with protestations of 'I really love (FooBazBar), I promise it's the best thing ever, now if you would only fix this bug…' and then angry flames over the bugs and defenders coming to protect the honor of FooBazBar.
Fix bugs and people are happy and stop talking. They return to happily using the product. Again, we're talking perverse incentives for just the sort of obnoxious behavior you describe, or worse.
However, if people were getting paid for fixing bugs and cleaning up old code, maybe that'd improve.