News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon shareholders reject facial recognition ban by dnautics on Thursday May 23, 2019 @03:27AM (#19989361)
It exists because the American government (or governments writ large around the world anyway) have had a poor track record of regulating things ethically. For example, the us government has not done a great job of ethically regulating native Americans, or, ethically regulating terrorism abroad, or maybe in more quotidian and economic terms, regulating the sale of loose cigarettes. It baffles the mind that one would want the same entity responsible for such large scale horrors responsible for deciding educational policy.

If you don't want to involve regulations resulting in people dying, we can look at regulating interior decorating, or hair braiding, neither of which was conducted in the public interest. Can you name the last 2000 regulations that have been enacted in the us? Can you be sure all of them were in the public interest?

Re:Amazon shareholders reject facial recognition ban by Duckeh on Thursday May 23, 2019 @03:52AM (#19989492)
Regardless of how well the democracy your government is based on is functioning, I have a rather hard time imagining that a corporation focused on maximizing shareholder profit would do anything better than a piss-poor job for the vast majority of the population.
Re:Amazon shareholders reject facial recognition ban by dnautics on Thursday May 23, 2019 @03:44PM (#19995227)
there's a wide amount of space between 'regulation by government' and 'regulation by corporations'
Re:Amazon shareholders reject facial recognition ban by Xelbair on Thursday May 23, 2019 @04:00AM (#19989537)
Option A: Government regulation, sometimes fails(Article 7 and 11), sometimes get things right(GDPR).

Option B: Corporate entity self-regulates in favor of profit. consumer is screwed.

Corporations regulate not for public interest, but for profit, sometimes it happens that those two are aligned - but that is an exception - not a norm.