News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon shareholders reject facial recognition ban by onion2k on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @11:41PM (#19988200)
The point is that if enough ethically-minded people who believe facial recognition is bad see Amazon doing things like facial recognition the company will lose customers and staff. The people proposing a ban presumably feel there enough of those people now (and in the future) that Amazon's bottom line is under threat and it needs protecting from itself.

The idea of outsourcing your company's ethics to the government seems very shortsighted to me. Facial recognition may never be banned, yet privacy tech could become a strong factor in where developers want to work. Consequently Amazon are right to consider this sort of thing long before the government steps in.

Re:Amazon shareholders reject facial recognition ban by dhimes on Thursday May 23, 2019 @08:24AM (#19990995)
I have probably a Pi radians stance from you. I don't believe Amazon (or Facebook or Google or ATT) will necessarily lose a meaningful number of customers. I don't think people are that cohesive in their thinking. It seems to be too easy to roll out benefits to the customer so they don't care about some abstract downside.

So if Amazon plays unethically, and plays well, and you are competing, you are going to be seriously hampered by not playing along too. And you will have a hard time justifying it to your shareholders or potential investors. Amazon couldn't even win this argument and the game's just starting.

I think ethical companies like the kinds of regulations that keep the playing field level and make ethical transgressions illegal. It gives them a strong support to make their ethical stand.

Look at all of the information that's being gathered today with no respect for the individual's privacy. I'm old enough that this is outrageous, and I really can't believe that people are standing for it. Yet it seems that every new app builder has to enter the market with a data-collecting free offering. If this were illegal, then they could compete on quality and price.

One thing I've learned as I've gone through some things is that if you're the only one in the game who's playing by the rules, you're going to lose.