News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon shareholders reject facial recognition ban by Jaepa on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @10:35PM (#19987828)
Yes, but that is kind of the point. The lack of checks and balances tend to lead to totalitarianism.
Re:Amazon shareholders reject facial recognition ban by judge2020 on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @11:03PM (#19987997)
So in what way will facial recognition and "criminal spotted on 5th avenue" either dissuade or encourage totalitarianism/removing checks and balances?. If a Gov't falls into totalitarianism, a facial recognition ban (both internally within AMZN as well as on a national/local level) won't stop them from requiring AMZN to provide them facial recognition behind-the-scenes.
Re:Amazon shareholders reject facial recognition ban by Jaepa on Thursday May 23, 2019 @01:34AM (#19988796)
Hypothetically?

A tool that could track individuals and was under the perview of Executive Branch (eg Homeland Security) sounds pretty dangerous. Any political rivals of family members who go for STI screening, abortion clinics, gay bars, oncologist, or couples consoling could be either leveraged or leaked for political effect. Or you it could be used to track groups of people, activist, reporters. Or any number of ways I wouldn’t be able to think of.

What I was trying to say is that if you are trying to establish a totalitarism not having any checks and balances on something like that would be handly.

Re:Amazon shareholders reject facial recognition ban by roenxi on Thursday May 23, 2019 @12:33AM (#19988499)
I agree with the general point that it isn't a good method of stopping a government falling into totalitarianism. However it is helpful if there is general consensus against facial recognition because it makes it a bit easier to identify the authoritarian-leading parts of government because they can't hide behind 'it is just usual practice'.

There are other, better, arguments in favor of personal liberty to use against facial recognition by law enforcement. Efficient, highly automated systems crush people who just happen to get caught up in them.

Re:Amazon shareholders reject facial recognition ban by AnthonyMouse on Thursday May 23, 2019 @01:47AM (#19988845)
> So in what way will facial recognition and "criminal spotted on 5th avenue" either dissuade or encourage totalitarianism/removing checks and balances?. If a Gov't falls into totalitarianism, a facial recognition ban (both internally within AMZN as well as on a national/local level) won't stop them from requiring AMZN to provide them facial recognition behind-the-scenes.

Technologies take time to develop and deploy, and the fact of their development and deployment is a red flag that tells you something bad is coming and gives you time to react before it can actually be put into place.

Setting everything up for turnkey totalitarianism is not wise.