Re:WestJet pilot’s eyes struck by laser on flight from Newfo...
by Moru on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @09:17PM
(#19987408)
I would not trust a pair of free goggles to protect my eyes from a 50 W laser.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:WestJet pilot’s eyes struck by laser on flight from Newfo...
by DuskStar on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @09:24PM
(#19987450)
> I would not trust a pair of free goggles to protect my eyes from a 50 W laser.
FTFY: I would not trust a 50 W laser.
I wouldn't trust it not to blind me, not to blind someone else, not to make burn marks on my walls, not to catch fire randomly, and not to actually output 50W.
This article [0] is a 'fun' look at the laser regulatory environment. Unfortunately, that environment doesn't seem to have teeth yet.
0: http://www.funraniumlabs.com/2017/08/laser-products-hate/
Re:WestJet pilot’s eyes struck by laser on flight from Newfo...
by amluto on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @09:40PM
(#19987538)
I was once helping troubleshoot a UV laser in a lab. It was an IR Nd:YAG pulsed laser with two frequency doublers, and I think the rated output was something like 1 J. The measured UV output was essentially nil. We took off the second doubler and fired the laser at the side of a desktop computer we didn’t care about while wearing serious goggles. There was a little snap and the paint got replaced with a shiny metal spot. :) You do not want a laser like that anywhere near your eyes.
Re:WestJet pilot’s eyes struck by laser on flight from Newfo...
by hobs on Thursday May 23, 2019 @12:06AM
(#19988344)
1 joule seems small, until you consider its of LIGHT.
Re:WestJet pilot’s eyes struck by laser on flight from Newfo...
by zaarn on Thursday May 23, 2019 @02:51AM
(#19989175)
The point of the goggles isn't to protect you from a 50W laser. Or even 1W laser (most googles will quickly melt).
The danger is reflections, at over a watt even the dot that the pointer produces on the wall can be bright enough to cause permanent blindness unless with goggles.