Re:ARM memo tells staff to stop working with Huawei
by Quarrelsome on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @09:23AM
(#19980884)
Byzantines robbed the silkworms in possibly one of the oldest written records of corporate espionage?
Re:ARM memo tells staff to stop working with Huawei
by Zenst on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @10:29AM
(#19981537)
I believe so, even if wiki disagree's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_espionage#Origins
Re:ARM memo tells staff to stop working with Huawei
by westiseast on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @03:34PM
(#19984652)
They don't share pandas at all - the pandas are 'rented out' to zoos around the world and subject to intense negotiation and strict contracts. Any baby pandas born on foreign soil still belong to China. So, no, they don't 'share' pandas at all.
Re:ARM memo tells staff to stop working with Huawei
by theandrewbailey on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @10:27AM
(#19981524)
Pandas.
Re:ARM memo tells staff to stop working with Huawei
by Zenst on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @10:37AM
(#19981638)
Yes, a loose connection but as China does treat them as if they are IP and with as much (if not more so) control - I include them. For example - if a country was to clone Panda's without China's consent, the level of outrage and response would be very comparable had some high-level IP had been stolen.
But as an isolated example - I'll agree it is a weak one, but worth including for how it is treated as IP by the country.
Re:ARM memo tells staff to stop working with Huawei
by barbecue_sauce on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @11:10AM
(#19982020)
I think he was just pointing out that it's Pandas, not Panda's.
I think only Panda's out of that small list have their IP still protected and the rest got industrial-theft treatment over the centuries. Though in fairness - they do share Panda's.