News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: What has not changed in the Tech industry within ... by ksaj on Tuesday May 21, 2019 @03:11PM (#19973729)
I see it doing the standard recon and working the appropriate exploit that would likely provide the most leverage with the least noise, but from within the target environment. So, yea, you've provided some good examples.

Once behind the firewall, outbound connections to a c&c could set off alarms. Especially if the connections are sourced from multiple internal systems to a single external one. So let an ai decide what to do once lateral movement options become available, then report back findings at a more appropriate time and method that is also less likely to ring bells.

That's just a quick synopsis. There is a lot more that could be done, but the secondary exploitation/invasion stages would probably see the biggest gains.

Re:Ask HN: What has not changed in the Tech industry within ... by world32 on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @05:39AM (#19979448)
I don't see how will ever be possible? There are just way way too many parameters to code an AI to do lateral movement or escalation once inside a system.

For example, even trying to exploit a famous vuln like dirtycow still often requires small tweaks to the exploit script in order to get it to work. There is no way an AI will be able to do that.

Though if you are talking about an "AI" that checks processes running, versions installed etc. and runs the appropriate exploits scripts metasploit already has that in the getsystem command. Though I wouldn't really consider that AI.

https://www.offensive-security.com/metasploit-unleashed/priv...