News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Free Wolfram Engine for Developers by enriquto on Tuesday May 21, 2019 @12:44PM (#19971858)
> If they open sourced it, it would be less than a year before you'd start seeing "Azure Wolfram" and "AWS Wolfram"

and using an AGPL licence, there would be no danger for them!

Re:Free Wolfram Engine for Developers by bdowling on Tuesday May 21, 2019 @01:47PM (#19972634)
An Affero GPL (AGPL) license wouldn’t prevent AWS or Azure from competing with Wolfram’s cloud service, it would just require that they publish their changes to the source code. They’d still eat Wolfram’s lunch, which is why it won’t happen.
Re:Free Wolfram Engine for Developers by VvR-Ox on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @06:44AM (#19979748)
Exactly. That's a good example what's wrong in our world. As long as this won't change we won't get closer to the FOSS world that every human deserves.
Re:Free Wolfram Engine for Developers by ninju on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @12:14PM (#19982720)
> "to the FOSS world that every human deserves"

Please explain how/why FOSS is human birthright?

Making good software requires significant effort (both up-front and on-going) and being compensated for that effort is reasonable

Re:Free Wolfram Engine for Developers by GordonS on Tuesday May 21, 2019 @01:34PM (#19972460)
There are ways around this. I quite like what TimescaleDB have done, with most features OSS, and the more advanced features are under an open source license that permits use for those building a product around it, but preventing TimescaleDB as a service.
Re:Free Wolfram Engine for Developers by pabs3 on Tuesday May 21, 2019 @10:29PM (#19977213)
A license like that discriminates against fields of endeavour (cloud companies), so it doesn't comply with the open source definition (item 6):

https://opensource.org/osd

Re:Free Wolfram Engine for Developers by GordonS on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @07:04AM (#19979851)
Agreed, which is why I specifically didn't refer to the TimescaleDB TSL license as "OSS".
Re:Free Wolfram Engine for Developers by hoseja on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @06:43AM (#19979740)
Then maybe open source definition should update as new ways to exploit it have been found?
Re:Free Wolfram Engine for Developers by GordonS on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @07:10AM (#19979891)
Agreed, but I think there would be big pushback from OSS proponents - in theory changes like this are diametrically opposed to the "No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor" tenent.

The problem of big cloud providers ripping off OSS works is a new one, but it is explicitly allowed by OSS licenses - really not sure what a "good" solution is here, but personally I like the route TimescaleDB has gone down.

Re:Free Wolfram Engine for Developers by pabs3 on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @09:20PM (#19987423)
I don't think it is a new problem, there have been people offering Apache servers as a service for a long time. Same for PHP, Wordpress and myriad other open source projects.
Re:Free Wolfram Engine for Developers by babyloneleven on Tuesday May 21, 2019 @02:06PM (#19972913)
There is no open source license like that.
Re:Free Wolfram Engine for Developers by GordonS on Wednesday May 22, 2019 @07:06AM (#19979867)
TimescaleDB's TSL license is not "OSS", but it is open source.

TimescaleDB has a good blog post about why they went this route[0]

I do think that perhaps we need to stop being so snooty about OSS vs open source, and recognise that companies with open source products are allowed to make a profit while preventing the big cloud providers from scalping them.

[0] https://blog.timescale.com/how-we-are-building-an-open-sourc...