News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Linux distros without systemd by AaronFriel on Monday May 20, 2019 @03:00PM (#19963804)
> People do not write million lines of code applications in bash, for a reason, trade-offs are to be made.

Isn't that basically what SysVinit and a good-sized chunk of the management tooling in Linux is?

To their credit, Bash is a _weird_ language, but it's not going to corrupt memory when it crashes, and its failure modes are pretty well understood by the distro maintainers writing those scripts.

Re:Linux distros without systemd by boomlinde on Monday May 20, 2019 @05:13PM (#19965261)
Those are all not million lines of code applications, but that only speaks in favor of a more traditional Unix userspace design. With modularity on the process level you don't need a million lines of code to herd services. Why an init system should a million lines of code is a mystery to me.