Love that idea, but again it's this abstract "change how people think" – who is organizing this collective action? How can I join their existing efforts? My comparative advantage is not public relations / marketing / persuasion, and while I'm going to of course keep trying to make sure the people around me understand the seriousness of the issue, I'm at a loss for how to have a larger impact.

1000% agreed that individual action is not enough, and that we need to get the corporations and governments of the world to make serious changes. But I have no idea what those changes are, or like you say, how we can make them while maintaining or improving lifestyles for all people.

Also, thank you for answering kindly and collaboratively. For some reason I'm just feeling really fed up with climate news porn today and these are all the frustrations and questions I've always wanted to ask.

Your quest for a large impact is noble, but I encourage you to think more locally. Consider your community first, because it's where you have the most direct levers for change. Hell, you could have a book club. You could write up an e-mail to your friends with the climate policies of relevant political candidates, "just FYI!".

There's a middle ground between "I'm buying local produce for myself" and "I'm quitting my job and chaining myself to an oil tanker."

I agree with you, but talking to my local community doesn't feel like it has an impact – everyone I know already agrees with me. All the candidates in our local elections claim to be "green"-focused. I'm wondering, where is the guidance for this? All successful social movements have been guided by leaders with clear expectations and guidelines and suggestions for people at every level of the movement to contribute. Seems like incredibly low hanging fruit to set up a "are you doing the right thing for climate change? do these things for these impacts" checklist, but I don't have the expertise to create that myself. Without it, any time anyone asks me how do I know what I'm doing/recommending will have an impact, I'm reduced to saying "someone on the internet who says they're a climate scientist told me so in a comment."

Sure, I get that. Metrics for impact here, as in many social/philanthropic endeavors, are hard to come by.

You're right about the leadership issue, it's one that has plagued the climate conversation ever since Al Gore fell off. Yale Climate has a somewhat old article on this [0], where you may find guidance.

Bottom line is you don't have to believe me. If you're looking for a modern scientist-leader, listen to Dr. Katharine Hayhoe's TED talk ("The most important thing you can do to fight climate change: talk about it" [1]).

[0]: https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2012/03/whose-is-the-... [1]: https://youtu.be/-BvcToPZCLI

First thing is to bother your politician. I wrote a rather disturbing email to my MP, for which I got an acknowledgement that she would go and look at the IPCC reports. A few relevant facts like >100 million barrels of oil consumed daily, human emission of CO2 in gigatons, and the possibility that we're already past tipping point. It was polite but really not a nice thing to read.

I do phone up product suppliers and ask them why they've overdone the packaging but if it's only me they will ignore me. I've bothered BP over their environmental damage in Africa, and much more. I'll continue to do more but in the end I despair because 90% of people don't care.

Were it not for health problems I'd be out in central london getting arrested with the other 1,000 or so arrests in the past few weeks.

So there's answers. But I've been talking about this, and doing stuff about it, for ~20 years and no-one gave a shit. Now it may be too late. So do as you please.

Individual action will not in and of itself solve the climate crisis, but I believe it could be a powerful lever to build the critical mass needed to put global warming at the top of our politicians' agendas. We need to convince our families, friends and neighbors that the climate crisis is a big deal. Words are cheap. But if people see us actully making substantive personal sacrifices in our own lives, sacrifices that cannot be merely written off as performative signaling, but that can only be explained by a strongly held belief that climate change is a BIG DEAL, our exhortations will be far more persuasive.

They can't be maintained or improved. People will be forced to accept a lower standard of life as they are switched to less environmentally impacting methods, and will be punitively taxed to cover for the things that it's simply impossible to remove.

We won't see everyone tooling around in their autonomous electric cars. the rich will have Tesla's, and everyone else will probably split the massive cost of an ICE car four ways instead of owning one, or walk everywhere.That's assuming we didn't kill half the jobs off in the USA because now a Burger King Value Meal costs $20, due to cigarette-style sin taxes.

You can systems level think all you like, the problem is when it gets expressed into concrete things. I think people would have to admit that it would be a pretty big qol step down for people...it's just that their solutions dovetail neatly with the way they live their lives already.

> People will be forced to accept a lower standard of life as they are switched to less environmentally impacting methods

This is precisely the kind of Carbon-Rules-All thinking that got us here. There is an implicit assumption that the only way we could have ever gotten to the "place we are today," however you choose to define that, is as a result of the burning fossil fuels.

I implore you to sit with some beer/wine/LSD and contemplate an alternative history in which we never drilled a single oil well but had the same desires for successful civilization. See where you get.

The "system level thinking" I'm talking about is the kind that works to explicitly maintain QOL while strongly curtailing emissions. It's possible, and is actually the only way.