Re:“It’s hard to take risks if you don’t have a safety net”
by DreamSpinner on Monday May 20, 2019 @08:20AM
(#19959632)
I believe the general thought is that at a very simple level, operating as a company provides for a number of protections for the owners/operators. At a societal level, the broad justification for allowing unnatural beings with those benefits is that it still provides a net benefit to society through things like employment opportunities,
taxes and the encouragement of economic activity. If the concept of a company no longer provides any non-trivial benefit to society (for example, no jobs or taxes), why should society collectively provide laws that allow them in the first place?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.