Re:OOP practiced backwards is "POO"
by russellperry on Saturday December 11, 2010 @11:41AM
(#1995110)
I get what you're saying, but Ruby already allows you to do this. If you like an API/design, then go ahead and reimplement it however you like. There are no class-level contracts anywhere in Ruby that would prevent this, and therefore interfaces provide no additional level of abstraction that Ruby doesn't already have.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.