News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OOP practiced backwards is "POO" by russellperry on Saturday December 11, 2010 @11:41AM (#1995110)
I get what you're saying, but Ruby already allows you to do this. If you like an API/design, then go ahead and reimplement it however you like. There are no class-level contracts anywhere in Ruby that would prevent this, and therefore interfaces provide no additional level of abstraction that Ruby doesn't already have.

There are no comments on this comment yet.