News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: RubyOnRails or Django/Pylons? by patio11 on Saturday December 11, 2010 @03:08AM (#1994456)
I looked into Sinatra, entirely at Thomas' suggestion. My experience after coding up a toy web application was that, if I wanted to build a non-toy application, I'd end up building a half-complete, undocumented, poorly tested version of Rails 1.0 prior to actually being able to work on the stuff people pay me money for.

It is a wonderful microframework if you want to either a) build a web framework because you want experience doing it or b) have some huge honking system which you just want to drizzle a bit of glue code onto and expose pretty much unmodified to HTTP.

Re:Ask HN: RubyOnRails or Django/Pylons? by danieldon on Saturday December 11, 2010 @04:37AM (#1994540)
Have you looked at Padrino? I recently experimented with it and was surprised that it was an extremely awesome middle ground, to the point where I'll probably use it for my next project. It's very fast, close to Rack and easy to use with Rack middleware, has Rails-style view helpers, has sinatra-style controllers, very simple and elegant mountable apps, a focus on DB agnosticism, among many other things
Re:Ask HN: RubyOnRails or Django/Pylons? by gte910h on Saturday December 11, 2010 @12:36PM (#1995216)
Question: Have you experience with it on heroku? Does it work well there? Any difference between its behavior and the "normal case" of RoR as far as what heroku is designed for to your knowledge?

(Like I've said, got nothing about ruby, just don't feel rails is a good fit for the stuff I do; something lighter weight like this could be a good substitue on heroku).

Re:Ask HN: RubyOnRails or Django/Pylons? by danieldon on Sunday December 12, 2010 @02:01PM (#1997660)
I haven't, but I know it works fine. Heroku is more of a Rack host than a Rails host, so any Rack-based framework (AFAIK, all Ruby frameworks at this point) run seamlessly on it.