Re:How Contemporary Art Became a Fiat Currency for the World...
by m_fayer on Friday May 17, 2019 @05:03AM
(#19937673)
It warps and stifles artists and the art world. An artist knows that only maybe 5% of artists manage to survive financially off their work, and maybe 1% become wealthy. Knowing that there is that lottery ticket, and that the odds can be boosted by catering to the whims of the ultra-rich and engaging in their cynical high-end social politics, that's hard to resist for many who are otherwise looking at being forced out of a beloved career or living in poverty. Many take the bait without realizing they're doing so, or somehow attempt to split the difference. Either way, it eventually causes some very fundamental psychic distress, and both artist and output suffer.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How Contemporary Art Became a Fiat Currency for the World...
by osullivj on Friday May 17, 2019 @05:10AM
(#19937707)
Is that so different from the world of startups?
Re:How Contemporary Art Became a Fiat Currency for the World...
by lmm on Friday May 17, 2019 @07:36AM
(#19938526)
Startup employees largely have better working conditions (even those who let themselves get conned into unpaid overtime) and softer landings. I remember a retrospective on a photo-sharing startup did the rounds a couple of years ago: it was a failure as a business but the developers were well-paid and able to walk into fresh software jobs at a good salary.