Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships
by robotresearcher on Friday May 17, 2019 @02:58AM
(#19936992)
I agree completely. But there should be some heterogeneity available in the routes to success. Not all bright kids are ready and trained for the SATs. I was not and luckily I found another route in 1990s England. I’m trying to keep some alternate routes open.
Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships
by okaram on Friday May 17, 2019 @08:05AM
(#19938688)
What do you mean by merit? Ability? Capacity? Effort? Worthiness? Ability at what?
Are the SATs a good measure of that?
Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships
by maceurt on Saturday May 18, 2019 @03:37AM
(#19946226)
Probably the best/ most ubiquitous method we have right now.
It would be trivial to improve our tests of merit compared to the almost impossible task of testing how well a student would do free from environmental factors.
Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships
by sgift on Friday May 17, 2019 @03:40AM
(#19937246)
> However, the person who wins should be the more qualified person based on merit
This has never been the case and will never be the case as long as some people are rich and other are poor. A "standard of suffering" tries to show that. Maybe it's a bad idea, but the current system is extremely bad, so people who dismiss this better come up with a better alternative.
I am not the person you were replying to, but no. However, the person who wins should be the more qualified person based on merit not based on some standard of suffering. Just because you had a harder environment does not mean you are more qualified than someone with an easier environment.