News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on MDS: Microarchitectural Data Sampling side-channel vulnerabilities in Intel CPUs. Parent comment

Re:MDS: Microarchitectural Data Sampling side-channel vulner... by pertymcpert on Friday May 17, 2019 @12:43AM (#19936364)
No there isn’t. But if you understand it I don’t get why you think 20% isn’t a good performance boost, especially considering the rate of return for power and area in silicon.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:MDS: Microarchitectural Data Sampling side-channel vulner... by beagle3 on Friday May 17, 2019 @07:43AM (#19938568)
Because many people believe it is a 100% improvement, plan/budget accordingly, and then look for help.

As far as silicon/power it is nice, but IIRC (I am not involved in purchasing anymore) it used to cost over 50% in USD for those 20% in performance when you non-HT parts were common.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:MDS: Microarchitectural Data Sampling side-channel vulner... by pertymcpert on Friday May 17, 2019 @07:19PM (#19944504)
What a strange way to measure the benefits of a performance optimization: "how people will perceive it and then ask me for help".
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:MDS: Microarchitectural Data Sampling side-channel vulner... by beagle3 on Saturday May 18, 2019 @01:57PM (#19948742)
You ignored the price issue, which was measurable and real, but also:

It (used to be) my job. Does "because people fall for deceptive marketing, waste money, and then waste my time trying to salvage their reputation" sound better?

[ Parent | on HN ]