News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Third fatal Tesla Autopilot crash renews questions about ... by sokoloff on Friday May 17, 2019 @12:03AM (#19936153)
I predict we won't have fully autonomous ("total") self-driving in the next 25 years. To think it will be out in the next year or even in the reasonably expected lifespan of currently shipping Teslas is utter folly, IMO.
Re:Third fatal Tesla Autopilot crash renews questions about ... by flukus on Friday May 17, 2019 @01:28AM (#19936589)
When I see long haul trucks driving along highways with humans only taking over in the populated areas I'll believe full self driving may only be a decade away. Tackling the full self driving consumer market when there's lower hanging fruit makes no sense.
Re:Third fatal Tesla Autopilot crash renews questions about ... by sundvor on Friday May 17, 2019 @05:06AM (#19937691)
They could wipe out Über.
Re:Third fatal Tesla Autopilot crash renews questions about ... by pas on Friday May 17, 2019 @06:37AM (#19938187)
Based on what?

It seems this is a classic estimation problem, and we need performance data points to fit a curve. Do we have anyting? Do we even know if this is a problem where we have a chance at accelerated compounding (so exponential improvement rate)?

Re:Third fatal Tesla Autopilot crash renews questions about ... by sokoloff on Friday May 17, 2019 @07:19AM (#19938428)
Based on the fact that we don't have acceptable performance on clear, sunny, well-marked roads today, I don't expect that we're within a year of handling snow-covered roads, road detours, human flagged construction details, etc.

I think the self-driving car efforts are dramatically underestimating the effort required to close those gaps to zero at least in the hype machine but also perhaps in the daily working cycle. (That's all well and good; I'm sure that any audacious engineering program should discount some of the hardest parts lest everyone get discouraged and never begin.)