SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships

Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships by sadris on Thursday May 16, 2019 @11:14PM (#19935904)

It occurs in most non-merit based social settings. 95% of all churches are 95% homogeneous. Racial groups self segregate at lunch tables. 85% of millennials don't have a single friend outside their own racial group.

In merit based settings like employement, the employer is going to be selecting for IQ so the racial demographic of the employees is irrelevant, only their productivity.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships by throwawaymath on Friday May 17, 2019 @01:00AM (#19936452)

I hate to be that person, but could you maybe cite those statistics? I was willing to give a pass on 95% of churches being 95% racially homogeneous, but I'm deeply skeptical the 85% figure is true for all millennials.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships by sadris on Friday May 17, 2019 @04:10AM (#19937383)

Sorry it was 75%: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/08/25/three...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships by esyir on Thursday May 16, 2019 @11:42PM (#19936055)

So, controversial question here. Is there a racial divide by IQ then?

I'm not talking about the cause of this, whether genetic, cultural or others. But right now in the United States, is there a sizable IQ distribution difference across the various racial groups?

[ Parent | on HN ]