Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships
by martin__ on Thursday May 16, 2019 @09:39PM
(#19935361)
Actually, the Gaokao does have something that might be similar where ethnic minorities get extra points:
https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1595620876524810727&wfr=spi...
Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships
by smilekzs on Friday May 17, 2019 @04:12AM
(#19937395)
That, however, does NOT favor the rich, mod cheating/forgery, which surprisingly does get caught, due to the widespread expectation of the system to be fair.
And there used to be bonus points for STEM Olympiads, which had totally worked as intended by providing a sound alternative for the talented / hard-working specialists who have not so much family backing. There were varying degrees of cheating (mostly in the form of leaked problem banks), more rampant in some provinces than others, but AFAIK the asking price was not totally out of reach for the common working family, so it'd be unfair to say cheating the exam favors the rich either.
Re:SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships
by lazyasciiart on Friday May 17, 2019 @01:14AM
(#19936524)
I don't think it's true that the Gaokao is regarded as a great equalizer. You might be misled by the fact that it is regarded as the only potential path out of rural poverty in China - but even in the wikipedia article you link it discusses many of the issues with it. And this (2014) NYT opinion piece covers some in more detail (including that yes, richer students also spend time after school preparing). https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/05/opinion/sunday/chinas-edu...
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_National_College_Entrance_...
[1]: (Chinese Wikipedia) https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018%E5%B9%B411%E6%9C%88%E6%B5...