News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why is a Rust executable large? (2016). Parent comment

[dead]
Re:Why is a Rust executable large? (2016) by dang on Friday May 17, 2019 @01:09AM (#19936505)
Would you please not argue in the flamewar style on HN? It's not what this site is for, and it damages the curiosity that it is for.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why is a Rust executable large? (2016) by steveklabnik on Thursday May 16, 2019 @01:47PM (#19931138)
> So aside from you, nobody on the team cared about i18n enough to actually get it implemented before deployment–it wasn't a priority. Got it.

It's not a matter of care; it's a matter of time and stuff to do. There are a lot of people willing to get extremely mad about the website online, but few people who are actually willing to step up and do work. That's the limiting factor on getting stuff done.

[ Parent | on HN ]