News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I Charged $18k for a Static HTML Page by prof1le on Wednesday May 15, 2019 @03:21PM (#19922770)
There were mentioned studies in the book "Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion" that mirrored what your parents experienced.

Long story short, a jeweler was trying to move some turquoise and told an assistant to sell them at half price while she was gone. The assistant accidentally doubled the price, but the stones still sold immediately.

Turns out there's a phenomenon where humans automatically associate price to quality. So getting charged more means we think we're getting better quality, regardless of the actual quality

Re:I Charged $18k for a Static HTML Page by kevin_thibedeau on Wednesday May 15, 2019 @03:48PM (#19923037)
Same for brown diamonds.
Re:I Charged $18k for a Static HTML Page by zrobotics on Wednesday May 15, 2019 @04:30PM (#19923443)
Honestly, you don't even need to specify 'brown', regular diamonds would apply. DeBeers has some awesome marketing, diamonds are one of the least beautiful gemstones.
Re:I Charged $18k for a Static HTML Page by groby_b on Wednesday May 15, 2019 @09:19PM (#19925328)
Beauty depends entirely on the cut. (If you haven't seen diamonds with "old european" cuts - late 19th century, essentially - you should. They are so much more beautiful than the sterile modern cut ones)
Re:I Charged $18k for a Static HTML Page by crooked-v on Wednesday May 15, 2019 @03:51PM (#19923067)
s/brown/"chocolate"/
Re:I Charged $18k for a Static HTML Page by lazyant on Wednesday May 15, 2019 @03:55PM (#19923096)
black pearls too no?