Re:Death rates from energy production per TWh
by KirinDave on Wednesday May 15, 2019 @01:27AM
(#19916654)
You're quoting contested science and I'm offering a summary of the counter opinion. It is far from a consensus that Chernobyl has been a net good for the animals living there.
As for RTGs, I'm sorry did you lose the plot about power production at the top of this thread?
Chernobyl being a place "where if most mammals go they die in agony" is patent nonsense. I quoted from the article linked above your post to suggest as much.
What on earth does RTG have to do with this discussion?