Poll: Should WikiLeaks be targeted or defended?

Re:Poll: Should WikiLeaks be targeted or defended? by whyme on Friday December 10, 2010 @08:38AM (#1991567)

Obviously you have a limited interpretation for the word attack:

Amongst the others:

  .. .to direct unfavorable criticism against; criticize   
  severely; argue with strongly: He attacked his opponent's 
  statement.

In fact your post is technically an attack suggesting no attacking. Still you feel justified to go around attacking?

Seriously - get over yourself - Do you really have nothing better to do than make comments like this?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Poll: Should WikiLeaks be targeted or defended? by wladimir on Friday December 10, 2010 @08:47AM (#1991593)

You seem to forget that people are getting seriously polarized over this issue, and with all the DDoSing and hacking going on I simply don't like that word "attacking" being used in this context.

The second part of my message was obviously not serious.

[ Parent | on HN ]