News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Military Bans Disks, Threatens Courts-Martial to Stop New... by rorrr on Friday December 10, 2010 @01:20AM (#1990849)
Weren't you connected to the internet?

What would stop you from connecting to Gmail (HTTPS) and emailing something to yourself?

Re:Military Bans Disks, Threatens Courts-Martial to Stop New... by die_sekte on Friday December 10, 2010 @02:48AM (#1991012)
Extensive proxying? MITM? There's no reason they wouldn't put their own root certificate onto the machines. For most work on Wall Street one probably doesn't even need to be connected to the internet.
Re:Military Bans Disks, Threatens Courts-Martial to Stop New... by arethuza on Friday December 10, 2010 @07:16AM (#1991409)
It's scary the number of people who think that HTTPS guarantees an end-to-end secure channel between your browser and the remote application.
Re:Military Bans Disks, Threatens Courts-Martial to Stop New... by die_sekte on Friday December 10, 2010 @07:44AM (#1991456)
Well, it does if you control the machine you're using. Or am I missing something?
Re:Military Bans Disks, Threatens Courts-Martial to Stop New... by arethuza on Friday December 10, 2010 @07:49AM (#1991470)
AFAIK if someone else controls the machine you are on (or can get certs installed by one way or another) which can be combined with a MITM proxy to get access to the unencrypted content.

However, a lot people use machines they don't control where this kind of approach is perfectly feasible.

Re:Military Bans Disks, Threatens Courts-Martial to Stop New... by thalur on Friday December 10, 2010 @08:32AM (#1991553)
blocking connections to gmail works ok. Of course, that doesn't prevent you printing stuff out...