News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California jury says Bayer must pay $2B to couple in Roun... by wutbrodo on Monday May 13, 2019 @10:26PM (#19906276)
Jury selection doesn't filter for intelligence, so your description doesn't seem applicable.
Re:California jury says Bayer must pay $2B to couple in Roun... by zamfi on Tuesday May 14, 2019 @01:38AM (#19907025)
I think you would be surprised.

Jury selection filters for people who vote, have long-term residence in a single location, have jobs that at least modestly allow jury service, and who actually show up to jury duty.

To make a sweeping generalization, those things all correlate with intelligence.

Anecdotally, the people I've met at jury selection in downtown Oakland, CA are not a representative sample of who you see outside the building.

Re:California jury says Bayer must pay $2B to couple in Roun... by raxxorrax on Tuesday May 14, 2019 @04:44AM (#19907806)
And therefore have an investment in ruling correctly. I think you are correct and the appeal to expert opinion is not convincing.

As a non-American, the jury system feels alien. Advantages and disadvantages, I guess.