Re:Did blind orchestra auditions benefit women?
by growlist on Sunday May 12, 2019 @06:52AM
(#19891191)
I've never seen rigorous scientific proof that these claims for the nebulous benefits of 'perspective' are real, outside of issues that are highly specific to a particular group - and let's be honest, we are all far more similar than we are different (highly unfashionable view, I know).
Re:Did blind orchestra auditions benefit women?
by bufferoverflow on Sunday May 12, 2019 @07:12AM
(#19891247)
Give me an IT perspective that a man can't possibly have, but a woman can.
Give me an IT perspective that a white man can't possibly have, but an Indian/Chinese can.
Re:Did blind orchestra auditions benefit women?
by DanBC on Sunday May 12, 2019 @07:15AM
(#19891252)
Period tracking apps are often written by men and fail to be actually useful to women because they miss a bunch of stuff.
https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2018/11/13/18079458/menstrual-...
Re:Did blind orchestra auditions benefit women?
by treis on Sunday May 12, 2019 @10:40AM
(#19892153)
That's a pretty dumb article. For example:
>Glow was even worse. The first onboarding screen asks users to choose their “journey” and provides three choices: avoiding pregnancy, trying to conceive, and fertility treatments.
If you go to https://glowing.com/ you can see their tag line is "Modern care for your fertility". So a good chunk of the article is nothing more than complaining that Glow isn't what they want it to be.
Re:Did blind orchestra auditions benefit women?
by layoutIfNeeded on Sunday May 12, 2019 @09:22AM
(#19891706)
>a white bro
Please don't do this on HN.
Asserting that white brogrammers cannot embody some perspectives doesn't say that they have a uniform background. It just asserts that your team will be made encompassing just that set of perspectives.