News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Can we get a good theory of categorical personali... by ErotemeObelus on Sunday May 12, 2019 @04:57AM (#19890875)
Maybe they're personality types and we're being too politically correct, unwilling to admit that some type are actually bad.
Re:Ask HN: Can we get a good theory of categorical personali... by ohyeshedid on Sunday May 12, 2019 @02:03PM (#19893423)
That would be at odds with the book you drew your conclusion from.
Re:Ask HN: Can we get a good theory of categorical personali... by ErotemeObelus on Tuesday May 14, 2019 @10:16PM (#19915834)
The DSM-V pretends they're personality disorders instead of personality types...because they want to be politically correct. But the truth is that they're personality types because they're always ego-syntonic. If they were disorders they would be ego-dystonic.
Re:Ask HN: Can we get a good theory of categorical personali... by ohyeshedid on Tuesday May 14, 2019 @10:25PM (#19915890)
DSM-5: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of _Mental Disorders_, 5th Edition.

They are personality disorders; trying to insert some kind of bias against political correctness isn't going to change that, nor does it support anything you're trying to say.

"If they were disorders they would be ego-dystonic."

I'm not sure you understand the concepts of disorders, or you're on some conspiracy trip; either way I'm not interested in debating someones opinion versus current scientific understanding.