Re:Boeing altered key switches in 737 MAX cockpit limiting a...
by kortilla on Sunday May 12, 2019 @12:08AM
(#19890080)
>so low to the ground because it was designed to support a non-jetway use case (which is now non-existent)
Complete bullshit. I’ve boarded/deplaned without a jetway in Beijing, SLC, JAC, and AMS in the last couple of years alone.
Re:Boeing altered key switches in 737 MAX cockpit limiting a...
by CydeWeys on Sunday May 12, 2019 @05:30AM
(#19890959)
I meant to say "no ground support whatsoever". I've deplaned 737s and 320s on the tarmac recently too (at big airports), and they used mobile stairs. It's the stairs integrated into the aircraft itself that the 737 was designed around, and that's what's antiquated. Hell, just flying the stairs around with you is very fuel inefficient.
Re:Boeing altered key switches in 737 MAX cockpit limiting a...
by hirowan on Sunday May 12, 2019 @07:23AM
(#19891274)
I think it's a little bit of everything (stairs, tech, loading/unloading) but the main reason prrrobably was being able to throw bags into the cargo hold without the need for GSE - the airstair could've easily been made taller.
Re:Boeing altered key switches in 737 MAX cockpit limiting a...
by raverbashing on Sunday May 12, 2019 @03:25AM
(#19890644)
It's not a "non-jetway" case, it's a non jetway and no airport stairs case and/or manual loading of cargo
An embedded staircase is an option on the 737
The 737 is riddled through with legacy design features and needs to be put to pasture once and for all. And designing a replacement wouldn't be from scratch; there are plenty of other modern airliners to base a new one off of.