News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New Taxes and Higher Density Aren't Fixing Vancouver's Ho... by xienze on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @10:17PM (#19864804)
> Today's luxury apartment is tomorrow's affordable one.

Housing ain’t exactly the same as the used car market. I don’t think there’s such thing as a house that was once going for $1M+ that is now “affordable” unless it’s in a horrible state of disrepair.

Re:New Taxes and Higher Density Aren't Fixing Vancouver's Ho... by closeparen on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @11:01PM (#19864999)
The crappy student apartments where I went to school housed upper-class families in their day (before suburbanization). It happens. Deteriorated grandeur has a certain charm.

More to the point, there are plenty of homes that were affordable and in disrepair not long ago, that are now going for $1M+ in exactly the same physical shape. San Francisco’s problem is definitely not that its housing stock is too nice.

Re:New Taxes and Higher Density Aren't Fixing Vancouver's Ho... by klyrs on Thursday May 09, 2019 @01:48PM (#19870439)
That isn't even true of many cars. 20-30 year old luxury cars sell for tens of thousands -- which might be cheap or comparable to new low-end car, if you don't consider cost of ownership
Re:New Taxes and Higher Density Aren't Fixing Vancouver's Ho... by matchbok on Thursday May 09, 2019 @05:43PM (#19872730)
Agreed, it is complex. I'd argue, though, that older apartments in nice neighborhood usually rent for less than brand-new ones.