Some AMD CPU's RDRAND might not return random data after a suspend/resume

Re:Some AMD CPU's RDRAND might not return random data after ... by JdeBP on Tuesday May 07, 2019 @02:54PM (#19852316)

How xe was doing this was in fact explained in the comment hyperlinked right at the start of this page, and H. Peter Anvin was thinking about this over 4 years ago. But for the doubters Vladislav has already reiterated the point.

* https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/11810#issuecomment...

There is no "however". This bug is about code that is, according to the AMD doco, using the instruction correctly; but that is, because the AMD processor has this possible state after a suspend+resume, getting all-ones as its random data, thereby causing ID collisions in a fairly wide range of possible things from freshly re-generated machine IDs to journal file header block IDs, and including unit invocation IDs.

* https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/717e8eda77b93ac396dc...

This indicates that a "should be fine" in another comment is not in fact true. (-:

* https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/717e8eda77b93ac396dc...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Some AMD CPU's RDRAND might not return random data after ... by zaroth on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @03:51PM (#19862249)

The Bugzilla report seemed to indicate that AMD was returning an error code, because OpenSSL was failing to generate a key, not generating a bad key?

Why would OpenSSL fail visibly if the API was returning success but with non-random data?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150286

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Some AMD CPU's RDRAND might not return random data after ... by int_19h on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @11:31PM (#19865129)

If you look closely at one of the error messages, it says "too many iterations", in what looks like a random generator. I wonder if at some point it has to iterate to get a number different from another one, and it just gets an endless stream of identical values?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Some AMD CPU's RDRAND might not return random data after ... by zaroth on Wednesday May 08, 2019 @11:51PM (#19865212)

I can’t imagine the code is checking the returned value for uniqueness after seeing a SUCCESS code, and iterating in the hopes that becomes less true.

That would be quite something to read the comment on;

// Here we check to be sure the Earth is not flat

...

// Seeing that the Earth is indeed flat, we will iterate in this absurdity some more in the hopes it rounds out eventually

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Some AMD CPU's RDRAND might not return random data after ... by int_19h on Thursday May 09, 2019 @04:11PM (#19871914)

Suppose you need to generate several unique 32-bit IDs for something?

[ Parent | on HN ]