Re:Launch HN: Prometheus (YC W19) – Remove CO2 from Air and ...
by rlucas on Monday May 06, 2019 @04:23PM
(#19843419)
If the alcohol upgrade to gasoline makes sense technically and economically for you, why is it not commonly done with (presumably much cheaper and extant in great volume) industrial alcohol today?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Launch HN: Prometheus (YC W19) – Remove CO2 from Air and ...
by Iv on Monday May 06, 2019 @10:41PM
(#19845955)
Actors are not necessarily as rational as Econ 101 would have us believe. Incomplete information, misinformation and advertisement distort the market. As well as monopolistic practices.
A lot of conspiracy theories are paranoid, but the propaganda machine of the oil industry is very real and managed to incite a lot of economically counter-productive policies.
Re:Launch HN: Prometheus (YC W19) – Remove CO2 from Air and ...
by gridlockd on Monday May 06, 2019 @05:16PM
(#19843972)
He said "inexpensive", not "economical". The whole process isn't economical yet. Perhaps conversion is more economical with their particlar sorts of alcohol though.
Re:Launch HN: Prometheus (YC W19) – Remove CO2 from Air and ...
by rlucas on Monday May 06, 2019 @05:23PM
(#19844029)
Understood, although eventually it has to become "economical" or it doesn't fly.
My point was, you can view the alcohols as a feedstock for the gasoline production, and given that, you might just stream in large quantities of already-produced and cheap grain ethanol etc. from Indiana.
Re:Launch HN: Prometheus (YC W19) – Remove CO2 from Air and ...
by hndamien on Monday May 06, 2019 @09:39PM
(#19845669)
It is more likely that polluting methods (net non-zero) will be forced to become uneconomical.