News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on .NET 5. Parent comment

Re:.NET 5 by basetop on Monday May 06, 2019 @03:01PM (#19842614)
What? Satya didn't invent .Net. The idea of .Net, like the JRE, was to write once and run everywhere. What's visionary about it?

It's sad how so many articles and comments come off just pure PR now. Not saying your comment is, but I have to wonder how much of the "news", comments and internet content is now just PR.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:.NET 5 by dtech on Monday May 06, 2019 @03:26PM (#19842847)
For a very long time .Net was Windows only. That only changed after Balmer was gone and Satya came in.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:.NET 5 by ygra on Monday May 06, 2019 @05:14PM (#19843952)
Some cross-platform considerations have been built into it from the start, though. And there has been an official open-source implementation on a non-Windows platform. Perhaps more to show that it's possible than as an actual usable artifact, but it was there.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:.NET 5 by kevingadd on Monday May 06, 2019 @06:35PM (#19844629)
I think describing Mono as Official is a bit of a reach. AFAIK they benefited from the patent promise but that was about it until the acquisition.

If you mean .NET Core as official open source, that's true, but it's a relatively recent thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:.NET 5 by ygra on Tuesday May 07, 2019 @12:31AM (#19846601)
There was Rotor on FreeBSD. Probably more a proof of concept, but it was there.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:.NET 5 by tracker1 on Monday May 06, 2019 @06:33PM (#19844618)
Mono existed from very early on with .Net and the core was pretty compatible. I think when MS bought Xamarin, it finally got the attention it deserved, and really did go to help .Net Core take form.
[ Parent | on HN ]