News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Automated Refactoring of a U.S. Department of Defense Mai... by le-mark on Monday May 06, 2019 @12:18PM (#19840817)
The second one immediately lowers the TCO for obvious licensing reasons

How true is that though? They'd still have software licensing, they still need an OS to run on Hercules after all.

Re:Automated Refactoring of a U.S. Department of Defense Mai... by fork1 on Tuesday May 07, 2019 @03:16AM (#19847248)
Not just the OS, legacy applications tend to rely on DB2, CICS, IMS, and what not. All of those have expensive licenses and cannot readily run on emulation. Switching to Hercules does not solve the issue, unless your cobol apps are barebone batches.
Re:Automated Refactoring of a U.S. Department of Defense Mai... by karambahh on Monday May 06, 2019 @02:00PM (#19842016)
It's been a long while.... At the time, RedHat was still "free".

Linux sysadmins were cheaper than their mainframe colleagues.

Hw was orders of magnitude cheaper.

Floor occupancy was lower.

We did not got as far as watts consumed per functional task performed but I doubt it would have tilted the balance?

Re:Automated Refactoring of a U.S. Department of Defense Mai... by karambahh on Monday May 06, 2019 @02:02PM (#19842035)
Sorry I misread your comment!

You're obviously right for licensing inside the emulator! However, the costs are(were?) in hardware & floor occupancy (as in "decomission a whole room"-cheaper)

Re:Automated Refactoring of a U.S. Department of Defense Mai... by mperham on Monday May 06, 2019 @01:52PM (#19841953)
No expensive IBM hardware support/services needed.
Re:Automated Refactoring of a U.S. Department of Defense Mai... by tyingq on Monday May 06, 2019 @07:29PM (#19844976)
IBM won't let you run OS/390, z/OS, etc, in Hercules for free. There's an ancient version of MVS you may be able to run with Hercules, but I'd expect a lawsuit anyway.