Re:Cost of serving billions of images per month
by spockz on Sunday May 05, 2019 @04:09AM
(#19831745)
Realistically the costs for the company are higher. At least in The Netherlands the total costs for the employer is between 2-3x because of social security, health insurance, pension, housing/office costs.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cost of serving billions of images per month
by jacquesm on Sunday May 05, 2019 @05:38PM
(#19835247)
I've been an employer in NL for close to 30 years and the 2-3x fully loaded is not supported by any data that I'm aware of. 1.5 or so is more like it.
Re:Cost of serving billions of images per month
by Jommi on Thursday May 09, 2019 @09:53AM
(#19868275)
Not even close to true. Especially when comparing California with EU countries, even high tax rate ones. The difference between net salary and what company pays is actually very similar.
Re:Cost of serving billions of images per month
by thepangolino on Sunday May 05, 2019 @06:08AM
(#19832046)
I have experience with Belgium, the 2 - 3x ratio is only true when considering the net wage of the employee.