News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:London girl could be first to have “air pollution” listed... by icebraining on Saturday May 04, 2019 @07:57PM (#19830187)
In a survey from 2015, almost 40% of vehicle commuters in London used a car[1]. That's not "statistical outliers".

[1] https://files.lsecities.net/files/2015/09/New-Urban-Mobility...

Re:London girl could be first to have “air pollution” listed... by pushpop on Sunday May 05, 2019 @03:35AM (#19831638)
We are talking about central London, not Greater London. Greater London is a massive area which has leafy suburbs and wide areas without congestion. Central London is where the worst of the problem is, where we have been discussing, where the congestion charge zone is, and where you (generally) wouldn’t see people commute to by car.

For what it’s worth, part of my commute is via car too. However I do then get the train into central London. So I would still be classed as a driver

Re:London girl could be first to have “air pollution” listed... by icebraining on Sunday May 05, 2019 @07:27AM (#19832266)
Fair enough. If nobody has an incentive to commute to central London by car, why the need for a congestion charge?
Re:London girl could be first to have “air pollution” listed... by pushpop on Sunday May 05, 2019 @10:58AM (#19833118)
The points are mutually inclusive. The congestion charge is one of the reasons why there is little incentive to drive in central London.