News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:Update Regarding Add-Ons in Firefox by mthoms on Saturday May 04, 2019 @06:39PM (#19829840)
Or maybe they take offence at your overall tone? You're clearly not interested in being constructive.

This kind of toxicity is exactly why many of us have "uninstalled" Reddit and the like.

Please refrain from bringing that toxicity to HN.

Re:Update Regarding Add-Ons in Firefox by isoskeles on Saturday May 04, 2019 @09:41PM (#19830564)
“Many commenters have spent their Saturday morning pushing a narrative that appeals to emotion.”

“Toxicity.”

Goes both ways.

Re:Update Regarding Add-Ons in Firefox by dang on Sunday May 05, 2019 @12:06AM (#19831096)
Could you please stop posting unsubstantive comments to Hacker News?
Re:Update Regarding Add-Ons in Firefox by isoskeles on Sunday May 05, 2019 @01:11AM (#19831291)
> It is too late to listen to reason. Many commenters have spent their Saturday morning pushing a narrative that appeals to emotion.

Your comment, my comment, that comment, none of them are substantive. Why isn't that comment removed yet?

Re:Update Regarding Add-Ons in Firefox by dang on Sunday May 05, 2019 @01:34AM (#19831346)
It's a matter of degree. Your comments went an order of magnitude further over the line.
Re:Update Regarding Add-Ons in Firefox by isoskeles on Sunday May 05, 2019 @01:48AM (#19831380)
I am positive my first comment on this thread was not an order of magnitude over the line, if we can quantifiably measure such a thing, and it got censored anyway. "I just switched my browser. Bye bye Firefox."

I mean if you want me to be reflective it's really not going to work if we're refusing to admit that either both of these comments should have been censored or the one above should not have been censored. But I get it, life's not fair and the squeaky wheel gets the grease.

Firefox zealots get to railroad commenters on HN, noted, I certainly won't engage in these discussions again.

Re:Update Regarding Add-Ons in Firefox by dang on Sunday May 05, 2019 @03:37AM (#19831649)
I can't consider only your first comment when you posted nine of them.