Re:Update Regarding Add-Ons in Firefox
by rincebrain on Saturday May 04, 2019 @01:08PM
(#19827742)
Because if the cert is (for example) actively revoked, that probably means you should stop trusting things signed by it in the past.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
But revocation is different from expiration.
If you're worried about a cert being compromised long after expiration and used to back-date a signature, you can show a warning, add a second signature with a local key at time of installation, use a blockchain to prove age, have a timestamping service generate its own signature at time of generation, etc.
Re:Update Regarding Add-Ons in Firefox
by rincebrain on Sunday May 05, 2019 @12:36PM
(#19833592)
Sure, my point was mostly that there are reasonable cases in which one might want to evaluate the signing of an addon after the fact.
That might make sense for TLS certificates where the server can change their content on a whim. A signed and installed addon has been trusted possibly for years, the need for sudden revocation is not dire enough compare to the price you have to pay for that (this failure, always-online requirement)